HKSAR v Li Kwok Cheung George; 5 Jun 2014

References: [2014] HKCFA 48, [2014] 4 HKC 101
Links: HKLII, Hklii, Hklii Summary
Coram: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ,, Mr Justice Fok PJ, Mr Justice Bokhary NPJ,, Lord Collins of Mapesbury NPJ
Ratio:Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal The court considered the wording of a Hong Kong money laundering ordinance.
Held: Ribeiro and Fok PJJ said in their joint judgment with which the other members of the Court of Final Appeal agreed, at para 84: ‘It is one thing to criminalise dealing with funds where the dealer knows or has reasonable grounds to believe that they are the proceeds of crime, it is quite a different matter to stigmatise as a money launderer, a lender dealing with its own ‘clean’ funds because of what the borrower does or intends to do with them.’
This case is cited by:

  • Cited – GH, Regina -v- SC (Bailii, [2015] UKSC 24, [2015] 1 WLR 2126, [2015] WLR(D) 178, Bailii Summary, WLRD, UKSC 2014/0035, SC, SC Summary)
    Appeal against conviction for entering into an arrangement for the retention of criminal funds. The defendant said that at the time of the arrangement there were not yet any criminal funds in existence. A had set up websites intending to con . .

(This list may be incomplete)

Last Update: 15-Jun-16
Ref: 565398