Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 3; No violation of Art. 13; Non-pecuniary damage – finding of violation sufficient; Costs and expenses award
45276/99, (2001) 33 EHRR 31, [2001] ECHR 211, [2001] ECHR 214
Worldlii, Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 3
Human Rights
Cited by:
Cited – Regina v Special Adjudicator ex parte Ullah; Regina v Secretary of State for the Home Department HL 17-Jun-2004
The applicants had had their requests for asylum refused. They complained that if they were removed from the UK, their article 3 rights would be infringed. If they were returned to Pakistan or Vietnam they would be persecuted for their religious . .
See Also – Hilal v The United Kingdom ECHR 15-Sep-2010
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 24 August 2021; Ref: scu.166048
