Highberry Limited, Highberry Llc v Colt Telecom Group Plc; in Re Colt Telecom Group plc (No 1): ChD 25 Nov 2002

Application for disclosure of documents, the provision of information, and directions for cross-examination in an unusual petition for an administration order. No-action clauses have been the subject of discussion in the International Court of Justice (although not the subject of decision) in relation to insolvency proceedings brought directly by bondholders.

Lawrence Collins J
[2002] EWHC 2503 (Ch), [2003] 1 BCLC 290
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedElektrim SA v Vivendi Holdings 1 Corp CA 24-Oct-2008
The court considered the construction of a ‘no action’ clause in a bond, under which clause only the trustee would have the right to take action to enforce it. . .
See AlsoColt Telecom Group Plc, In the Matter of the Insolvency Act 1986 ChD 20-Dec-2002
. .
CitedNML Capital Ltd v Argentina SC 6-Jul-2011
The respondent had issued bonds but in 2001 had declared a moratorium on paying them. The appellant hedge fund later bought the bonds, heavily discounted. Judgment was obtained in New York, which the appellants now sought to enforce against assets . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency, Litigation Practice

Updated: 06 December 2021; Ref: scu.178480