EAT Disability discrimination – Justification
The Appellant alleged that the Tribunal had misdirected itself on the issue of justification in a disability discrimination case and had asked whether the employer’s decision was rational, in the sense of perverse, rather than within the range of reasonable responses as laid down in Jones v Post Office [2001] ICR 805. EAT held that as a matter of construction of the decision, the Tribunal did not fall into this error.
Judges:
Elias P J
Citations:
[2006] UKEAT 0594 – 05 – 0706
Links:
Employment
Updated: 15 August 2022; Ref: scu.403351
