The appellant challenged a finding that her fitness to practice had been impaired by misconduct and the attachment of a conditions of practice order effective for six months.
Held: The Panel had applied the correct test.
Judges:
Wyn Williams J
Citations:
[2013] EWHC 696 (Admin)
Links:
Statutes:
Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001 21
Citing:
Cited – Roylance v The General Medical Council (No 2) PC 24-Mar-1999
(Medical Act 1983) Dr Roylance was the chief executive of a hospital in which there had been excessive mortality rates of children who underwent cardiac surgery and had failed to take steps to deal with the problem.
Held: A doctor who carried . .
Cited – Cohen v General Medical Council Admn 19-Mar-2008
The appellant consultant anaesthetist appealed against the decision of the respondent’s Fitness to Practice Panel to impose conditions on his registration.
Held: The appeal succeeded: ‘Any approach to the issue of whether a doctor’s fitness to . .
Cited – General Medical Council v Professor Sir Roy Meadow, Attorney General CA 26-Oct-2006
The GMC appealed against the dismissal of its proceedings for professional misconduct against the respondent doctor, whose expert evidence to a criminal court was the subject of complaint. The doctor said that the evidence given by him was . .
Cited – Spencer v General Osteopathic Council Admn 8-Nov-2012
Irwin J was asked to elucidate the meaning of the phrase ‘unacceptable professional conduct’ within the 1993 Act. No authority was cited to the learned judge dealing, specifically, with that phrase in that Act but Counsel for the Appellant placed . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Health Professions
Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.472510