EAT Practice and Procedure. Employment Tribunal Chairman rejecting claim form on basis that Claimant’s address not given (but Claimant’s solicitors’ name and address were given). Application for review refused by Chairman. These appeals, against both decisions, raise the questions (1) whether the procedural rules are absolute and/or (2) whether their rigour may be tempered on a review.
Judges:
Mr Recorder Luba QC
Citations:
[2006] UKEAT 0181 – 06 – 1905, UKEAT/0181/06, [2007] ICR 18, [2007] IRLR 8
Links:
Cited by:
Cited – The Highland Council v TGWU and Unison EAT 3-Jun-2008
EAT EQUAL PAY ACT: Equal value
Equal Pay claims. Whether letters sent to local authority employers by unions prior to coming into force of the statutory grievance procedures met the requirements of regulation . .
Cited – Unison and Another v National Probation Service South Yorkshire and Another EAT 4-Feb-2010
EAT PRACTICE and PROCEDURE
APPLICATION/CLAIM
ET1 submitted with a fully pleaded case identifying two Claimants – however ET1a omitted. Employment Judge held that no valid claim presented by second . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 08 July 2022; Ref: scu.245391