Unison and Another v National Probation Service South Yorkshire and Another: EAT 4 Feb 2010

EAT PRACTICE and PROCEDURE
APPLICATION/CLAIM
ET1 submitted with a fully pleaded case identifying two Claimants – however ET1a omitted. Employment Judge held that no valid claim presented by second Claimant – appeal allowed – principles in Hamling v Coxlease School applied; observations on procedure to be followed where Tribunal staff do not appreciate that a claim has been made – review application not necessary.

Judges:

Richardson J

Citations:

[2010] UKEAT 0339 – 09 – 0402, [2010] IRLR 930

Links:

Bailii

Citing:

CitedHamling v Coxlease School Ltd EAT 19-May-2006
EAT Practice and Procedure. Employment Tribunal Chairman rejecting claim form on basis that Claimant’s address not given (but Claimant’s solicitors’ name and address were given). Application for review refused by . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 14 August 2022; Ref: scu.401655