Immigration Judicial Review – The decision in Nash v Chelsea College of Art and Design [2001] EWHC 538 (Admin) may provide a useful tool on the issue of whether a supplementary decision letter amounts to a fresh decision, or whether it merely supplements the decision already made, and in relation to matters to be considered in terms of the effect of such a supplementary decision letter.
Coker UTJ
[2015] UKUT 414 (IAC)
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Useful – Nash v Chelsea College of Art and Design QBD 11-Jul-2001
A student’s appeal against her examination marking was heard, but the reasons were only given some months later.
Held: When looking to see whether those reasons should be admitted, a court should be careful before accepting late reasons, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration
Updated: 03 January 2022; Ref: scu.550625
