Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Hamar and Another v Pensions Ombudsman and Another: CA 24 Mar 1997

Trustees are unable to challenge application validity at first on appeal from Ombudsman.
Times 24-Mar-1997
Pension Schemes Act 1993 15(4)
England and Wales

Updated: 21 April 2021; Ref: scu.81180

Posted on April 21, 2021April 21, 2021 by dlsPosted in Financial ServicesTagged Financial Services

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Commission v Belgium and Du Gaz Naturel (Judgment): ECJ 3 Dec 2020
Next Next post: In Re O (A Minor) (Witness Sumons): CA 21 Mar 1997

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,121)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (619)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (359)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,496)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (167)
  • Commercial (1,422)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,023)
  • Constitutional (948)
  • Construction (1,169)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (616)
  • Contract (6,112)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,531)
  • Crime (8,397)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,313)
  • Criminal Sentencing (1,940)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,625)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,719)
  • Environment (820)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,861)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,589)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,012)
  • Health (1,522)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,927)
  • Housing (1,986)
  • Human Rights (19,557)
  • Immigration (56,350)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,611)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,041)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,531)
  • International (956)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,046)
  • Jury (839)
  • Land (5,293)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,647)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,955)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,062)
  • Litigation Practice (7,049)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,752)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,894)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (823)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,740)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,755)
  • Transport (2,040)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,780)

Recent Posts

  • Director of Public Prosecutions v Bury Magistrates’ Court: Admn 13 Dec 2007
  • Gnezele, Regina (on the Application of) v Leeds City Council and Another: Admn 11 Dec 2007
  • Gungor, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 15 Aug 2008
  • Farrand v Cooper: 25 Apr 1862
  • A E Yates Trenchless Solutions Ltd v Black and Veatch Ltd: TCC 19 Dec 2008
  • Secretary of State for the Home Department v AR and others: Admn 14 Nov 2008
  • K, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 24 Sep 2008
  • RD and Another, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Admn 31 Oct 2008
  • MH and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Admn 23 Oct 2008
  • Manchester City Council, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs: Admn 14 Dec 2007
  • Littman, Regina (on the Application of) v London Borough of Barnet: Admn 20 Dec 2007
  • Congleton Engineering Developments Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 1 Sep 2008
  • Heys v Tindall: 25 May 1861
  • Green v Saddington: 1857
  • D v Bedfordshire County Council and Another: Admn 4 Nov 2008
  • Don Valley Precision Engineers Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 1 Sep 2008
  • Bewley v Revenue and Customs: VDT 1 Sep 2008
  • Gartenart Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 11 Sep 2008
  • Gabriel Mckeon v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 19 Dec 2007
  • Munir, Regina v: CACD 10 Nov 2008
  • Martin v Her Majesty’s Advocate: HCJ 31 Oct 2007
  • Rapos v Slovakia: ECHR 20 May 2008
  • The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Isle of Wight Council, Mid-Suffolk District Council, South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council, West Berkshire District Council: ECJ 12 Jun 2008
  • Manley and Another v New Forest District Council: Admn 6 Nov 2007
  • British Board of Film Classification, Regina (on the Application of) v Video Appeals Committee: Admn 21 Dec 2007
  • Crown Prosecution Service v Gloucester Justices: Admn 17 Jun 2008
  • British Telecommunications v Office of Communications: CAT 20 May 2008
  • Crown Prosecution Service v Brown: Admn 20 Dec 2005
  • Attorney General v Ali: Admn 13 May 2008
  • Rwenpower Plc v Cooper (Valuation Officer): LT 23 Jun 2008
  • McCormack v Tribunal De Grande Instance, Quimper, France: Admn 20 May 2008
  • Hutchison 3G UK Limited v Office of Communications: CAT 20 May 2008
  • G, Regina (on the Application of) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust: Admn 20 May 2008
  • Edmunds v Information Commissioner: IT 20 May 2008
  • Smith v The United Kingdom: ECHR 20 May 2008
  • Tomecki v Poland: ECHR 20 May 2008
  • Twizell v the United Kingdom: ECHR 20 May 2008
  • Philliskirk v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families: CST 20 May 2008
  • Richards v National Probation Service: Admn 29 Nov 2007
  • OH (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 30 Apr 2008
  • Ashcroft v Haberdashers Aske’s Boys School: EAT 14 Nov 2007
  • Taylor v East Midlands Offender Employment: EAT 20 Jul 2000
  • Birch, Regina v: CACD 20 Apr 2007
  • Regina v May and others: CACD 2005
  • Bristol, Regina v: CACD 4 Dec 2007
  • Chohanl, Regina v: CACD 6 Dec 2007
  • Southwell, Regina v: CACD 25 Feb 2008
  • Adebayo, Regina v: CACD 17 Apr 2007
  • Regina v Clark: CACD 9 Oct 2007
  • M, Regina v: CACD 20 Dec 2007

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.