The court considered whether proceedings for defamation had been served within time. The words complained of were issed in May 2010, the proceedings were issued just in time, and service had not been within time, but had been within an extension of time granted by the court.
Judges:
Tugendhat J
Citations:
[2012] EWHC 1046 (QB)
Links:
Defamation, Litigation Practice
Updated: 07 October 2022; Ref: scu.452979
