H, Regina v Re Interlocutory Application: CACD 7 Jul 2006

The defendant sought leave to appeal against a refusal of a crown court judge at a preparatory hearing to order disclosure.
Held: Because orders for disclosure would not form part of the material to be considered in a preparatory hearing as such, there was no right of appeal.

Judges:

Maurice Kay LJ, Crane, Dobbs JJ

Citations:

Times 01-Aug-2006, [2006] EWCA Crim 1975

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 29, Criminal Justice Act 1987

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedRegina v Maxwell CACD 9-Feb-1995
. .
CitedRegina v B and G; Re Interlocutory Application CACD 27-May-2004
Rose LJ considered the obligation on a court to accept a lawyer’s view as to whether the continued representation of a criminal client would cause professional embarassment: ‘We think it right, both in principle and pragmatically, that whether a . .
CitedRegina v Crown Prosecution Service, Re Interlocutory Application CACD 7-Sep-2005
The defendants in a forthcoming trial had applied for disclosure of surveillance tapes (some 15,000 hours) made during the investigations anticipating an application for a finding of abuse of process. Some had been served, but the prosecutor now . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.259180