IPO The applicants did not offer observations to meet the examiners objection that the product had already been the subject of a certificate. Subsequent warnings that failure to reply would result in rejection and an invitation to be heard also failed to illicit a response. Therefore the application for an SPC was rejected.
Judges:
Mr R Walker
Citations:
[2002] UKIntelP o27502, O/275/02, SPC/GB/98/010
Links:
Intellectual Property, European
Updated: 15 October 2022; Ref: scu.455187
