Gul (H) v Regina: CACD 31 Jul 2012

The defendant appealed against his conviction for conveying ‘List A’ articles into prison. He said that the proceedings had been a nullity for failure to comply with the requirements of Schedule 3 of the 1998 Act. He had not been notified of the possibility of making representations.
Held: The appeal failed. The definition of terrorism in section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000 did operate so as to include within its scope any or all military attacks by a non-state armed group against any or all state or inter-governmental organisation armed forces in the context of a non-international armed conflict.

Judges:

Igor Judge, Baron Judge LCJ, Mackay, Sweeney JJ

Citations:

[2013] 1 WLR 1136, [2012] WLR(D) 245, [2013] 1 Cr App R 4, [2013] Crim LR 67, [2012] EWCA Crim 1761

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Prison Act 1952 40(1)(b), Crime and Disorder Act 1998 51

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Crime

Updated: 05 November 2022; Ref: scu.464570