Claimant provided appropriate details of the claim
EAT Application to ET rejected by ET under Rules 1-3 of the 2004 Rules of Procedure contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 because claimant did not provide ‘details of the claim’ – held an error of law because the claimant did provide such details as set out in EAT judgment – Order made that the claim was validly lodged and should now be processed through the ET in the usual manner.
His Honour Judge Prophet
UKEAT/0070/05, [2005] UKEAT 0070 – 05 – 1703, [2005] IRLR 596
Bailii, EAT
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – The Highland Council v TGWU and Unison EAT 3-Jun-2008
EAT EQUAL PAY ACT: Equal value
Equal Pay claims. Whether letters sent to local authority employers by unions prior to coming into force of the statutory grievance procedures met the requirements of regulation . .
Cited – City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council v Pratt EAT 4-Oct-2006
EAT Practice and Procedure
Statutory dispute resolution procedures introduced by the Employment Act 2002 – modified grievance procedure – whether employee complied with requirement to set out in writing the . .
Cited – City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council v Pratt EAT 9-Jan-2007
bradford_prattEAT2007
EAT Practice and Procedure
Statutory dispute resolution procedures introduced by the Employment Act 2002 – modified grievance procedure – whether employee complied with requirement to set out in writing the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 01 November 2021; Ref: scu.224715
