Griffiths and Another v Cetin (Practice and Procedure): EAT 1 Apr 2021

The Tribunal refused to grant extensions of time:
(1) by one day for a party’s notification under Rule 3(10) of the EAT Rules 1993 of dissatisfaction with a decision under Rule 3(7), where there was no clear and acceptable explanation for the delay; and
(2) by 219 days for the lodging of a Notice of Appeal, where on analysis the Appellant could have appealed in time and the real reason for the delay was a change of mind.

Citations:

[2021] UKEAT 1150 – 19 – 0104

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment

Updated: 26 November 2022; Ref: scu.661711