Greenwich London Borough Council v Powell: HL 1989

A person could be a gypsy for the purpose of section 16 of the 1968 Act if he led a nomadic way of life only seasonally.

Judges:

Lord Bridge of Harwich

Citations:

[1989] 1 AC 995

Statutes:

Caravan Sites Act 1968 16

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedWrexham County Borough v The National Assembly of Wales, Michael Berry, Florence Berry CA 19-Jun-2003
A traditional gypsy family had settled because of ill health, and sought to establish a caravan site. The authority claimed they were no longer to be treated as Gypsy and having the entitlement under the Act.
Held: The Act defined ‘Gypsies’ as . .
CitedRegina v South Hams District Council, ex parte Gibb and Another, Regina v Gloucester Cc, ex parte Davies CA 8-Jun-1994
The meaning of ‘Gypsy’ under the Act requires some element of travelling, and should include that this was associated with the means of earning a living. In applying the statutory definition of gypsies the actual words used are to be used, taking . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Housing

Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.184234