Green v Palmer: 1944

The tenant had a six monthly tenancy of furnished premises. He said that a right given by the agreement to a renewed lease which was again to include the right to a new lease, made it perpetually renewable under the 1922 Act.
Held: No perpetually renewable lease could have been intended by the parties in such a tenancy agreement.

Judges:

Justice Uthwatt

Citations:

[1944] 1 Ch 328

Statutes:

Law of Property Act 1922

Cited by:

CitedMarjorie Burnett Ltd v Barclay ChD 12-Dec-1980
A lease was created of a shop, dwellings and out-buildings. By clause 6 the tenant had a right to renew the lease, with the new lease creating the same provision. The defendant claimed that as a perpetually renewable lease it took effect as a lease . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Landlord and Tenant

Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.259713