Grant v Edmondson: CA 1931

The distinctions required by the established rules as to whether a covenant ‘touches and concerns’ the land rules are quite illogical.

Romer LJ
[1931] 1 Ch 1
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedHarbour Estates Limited v HSBC Bank Plc ChD 15-Jul-2004
The lease contained a break clause. The parties disputed whether the benefit of the clause was personal to the orginal lessee, or whether it touched and concerned the land, and therefore the benefit of it passed with the land.
Held: The . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Land

Updated: 10 December 2021; Ref: scu.263197