Does the established practice of the High Court, to make no order for costs for or against an inferior tribunal or court which plays no active part in a judicial review of one of its decisions, extend to the Board?
Judges:
Gloster VP CA, David Richards, Kickinbottom LJJ
Citations:
[2017] EWCA Civ 1003, [2017] 1 WLR 4107, [2017] WLR(D) 474
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
First Instance main judgment – Regina on the Application of Davies (No 2) v HM Deputy Coroner for Birmingham CA 27-Feb-2004
The claimant appealed against a costs order. She had previously appealed against an order of the High Court on her application for judicial review of the inquest held by the respondent.
Held: The coroner, and others in a similar position . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Gourlay, Regina (on The Application of) v Parole Board SC 4-Dec-2020
The appellant life prisoner had successfully challenged a decision of the parole board, but had later been refused his costs on the basis that the Board had been acting in effect as a judicial body. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Judicial Review, Costs
Updated: 25 September 2022; Ref: scu.589928
