While training for the ICS, the family member had been supported out of joint family resources it was held that the income earned by him from an appointment in the ICS was property of the joint family. This was a strict interpretation of the Hindu Fruits of learning doctrine.
Citations:
(1921) LR 48 IA 162
Cited by:
Cited – Singh v Singh and Another ChD 8-Apr-2014
The parties disputed ownership of various valuable properties. The father asserted that they were held under trusts following the Mitakshara Hindu code, under a common intention constructive trust. The son said that properties held in his own name . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Commonwealth
Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.523689
