Globe, component manufacturers had a contract to supply TRW. The contract was exclusive. It contained a clause disallowing any amendment.
Held: (Obiter) Beatson LJ thought such clauses unenforceable.
Moore-Bick VP CA, Beatson, Underhill LJJ
[2016] EWCA Civ 396
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Globe Motors Inc and Others v TRW Lucasvarity Electric Steering Ltd QBD 8-Nov-2012
The defendants sought to have struck out parts of the claimants’ Particulars of Claim. . .
Appeal from – Globe Motors, Inc and Others v TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Ltd ComC 11-Nov-2014
Trial of claims by the Claimants for breach of contract and negligent misstatement against the Defendants arising from an exclusive supply agreement . .
See Also – Globe Motors Inc and Others v TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Ltd and Another ComC 23-Mar-2015
Calculation of quantum . .
Cited by:
Cited – Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd SC 16-May-2018
The parties disputed whether a contract (licence to occupy an office) had been varied by an oral agreement, where the terms prohibited such.
Held: The ‘no oral variation’ clause applied. Such clauses were in common commercial use and served a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 20 July 2021; Ref: scu.562451
