Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

Gibbs v King’S College Nhs Foundation Trust: SCCO 22 Nov 2021

Costs Judge Rowley
[2021] EWHC B24 (Costs)
Bailii
England and Wales

Costs

Updated: 23 January 2022; Ref: scu.670755

Posted on January 23, 2022 by dlsPosted in Costs

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: General Medical Council (Local Government (Other)) FS50605197: ICO 23 Aug 2016

Next Next post: Runham and Naramore v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 17 Jan 2011

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

Lohmann v Rougemont And Another: 24 Jan 1840
The Queen v The Tithe Commissioners For England And Wales: 18 Dec 1849
Re Hall’s Charity: 7 May 1851
Whitmarsh v Robertson: 25 Jan 1845
Ex Parte Johnstone, In The Matter Of Johnstone, Against Whom A Petition Of Adjudication In Bankruptcy Has Been Filed: 21 Jan 1851
Saunders v Vautier: 5 Jun 1841
Luckie v Gopert: 26 Nov 1841
The Attorney-General, At The Relation Of Freer, Thompson, Flower, Lucy, Ford, Greaves, and The Mayor, Aldermen, And Burgesses of The Borough of Stratford-Upon-Avon County of Warwick,: 17 Jul 1851
Mullock, An Behalf, and Co v Jenkins: 17 Nov 1851
The Agricultural Cattle Insurance Company v Sir John Foster Fitzgerald, Knight: 1851
Lewis v Samuel: 17 Apr 1846
The Queen v The Inhabitants Of Silkstone: 9 Nov 1842
Regina v The Mayor And Town Clerk Of Evesham: 9 May 1838
Laird v Pim and Another: 18 Jan 1841
The Said James Clark v Sree Mutty Doorgamoney Dossee, Executrix; And Prawnkissen Mullick, And Sreekissen Mullick, Executors Of Baboo Rouplaul Mullick, Deceased: PC 11 Dec 1840
The Bank of Australasia v Nias: 1851
The Bank of Australasia v Harding: 1850
First National Bank Plc v Syed: CA 1991
Mentor Corporation v Hollister Incorporated: ChD 1991
Joseph Le Fanu, And Edward Bull v Joseph Malcomson And Others: HL 27 Jun 1848
Beavan v The Earl Of Oxford: 29 Jan 1856
Regina v Gamlen: 1858
Regina v Hockey: CACD 2007
Kelson v Kelson: 11 Feb 1853
Burrows v Walls: 10 Mar 1855
Kelson v Kelson: 13 Jan 1853
Regina v Lister and Biggs: 1856
Ex Parte John Bowers In The Matter Of John Bowers, Against Whom A Petition For Adjudication In Bankruptcy Has Been Filed: 14 Jan 1852
In re Ford’s Charity: 6 Jul 1855
In Re Saunders’ Trust: 17 Jan 1857
Chamberlain v Hutchinson: 9 Jul 1856
Lake v Brutton: 9 Jul 1856
Green v The London General Omnibus Company (Limited): 18 Nov 1859
Sarah, The Wife Of Baron D’Oechsner, By John Holt Her Next Friend, v Scott And Others: 23 May 1857
Reis And Another v The Scottish Equitable Life Assurance Society: 6 May 1857
Regina, and Francis Hart Dyke, Her Majesty’s Procurator-General v Johann Peter Hildebrandt;The Aline and Fanny: PC 9 Jul 1856
Avery v Bowden: 1856
Avery v Bowden (2): 1856
Dimtsu v Westminster City Council: EAT 1991
Regina v Primelt and Simmonds: 1858
Dooly v The Great Northern Railway Company: 27 Jan 1860
Charles Edward Lewis v Thomas Nichols Roberts: 11 Nov 1861
Dutton And Another v Powles: 3 Feb 1862
Lawrence, Clerk v The Churchwardens And Overseers Of The Parish Of Tolleshunt Knights: 7 May 1862
Meek v The Whitechapel Board of Works: 1860
Dutton v Hally: 12 Jun 1862
Regina, On The Prosecution Of The Guardian Of The Poor Of The Strand Union v The Overseers Of The Poor Of The Parish of St Giles In The Fields: 10 Nov 1860
Pym, Administratrix v The Great Northern Railway Company: 17 Jun 1862
Ex Parte William Ackroyd, John Foster And Edward Townend In The Matter Of An Arrangement By Deed Between William Cheesebrough And Samuel Laycock Tee, Carrying On Business Under The Style Or Firm Of William Cheesebrough &Amp; Son,etc: 14 Nov 1860
Regina v The Vestry of St Luke’s Chelsea: 22 Jan 1862

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.