The claimant had had his UK nationality removed on the grounds that it would be conducive to the public good to do so because the Security Service had assessed that he was involved in terrorism related activities and had links to a number of Islamist extremists. He contended that this would leave him stateless.
Held: The appellant had not shown that he could not effectively exercise his rights of appeal and that, on the facts, the Secretary of State could not be criticised for not allowing him to return to prosecute his appeal, as if he were held on appeal to be a threat to national security, that would be liable to frustrate the decision to exclude him and deprive him of his nationality.
Mitting J
[2011] EWHC 1875 (Admin), [2012] 1 WLR 2568, [2012] 1 All ER 1129
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – G1 v Secretary of State for The Home Department CA 4-Jul-2012
The Secretary of State deprived the appellant of his UK nationality and made an exclusion order while he was in Sudan. He now appealed, against the dismissal of his claim for judicial review, brought to challenge that decision made on the ground . .
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 July 2021; Ref: scu.464551
