On an application for an order to suspend enforcement of an order for removal, the court or tribunal would take due account of four factors. The fourth was: ‘that in cases where the central issue is whether the offender has sufficiently been rehabilitated to diminish the risk to the public from his behaviour, the experience of immigration judges has been that hearing and seeing the offender give live evidence and the enhanced ability to assess the sincerity of that evidence is an important part of the fact-finding process . . ‘
Judges:
Blake J and UTJ Goldstein
Citations:
[2016] UKUT 24 (IAC)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Kiarie and Byndloss, Regina (on The Applications of) v Secretary of State for The Home Department SC 14-Jun-2017
The court considered a challenge to the rules governing ‘out of country’ appeals against immigration decisions. They had in each case convictions leading to prison terms for serious drugs related offences.
Held: The appeals were allowed, and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration
Updated: 08 August 2022; Ref: scu.560519
