Geistbeck and Another v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs Gmbh: ECJ 29 Mar 2012

ECJ Opinion – Intellectual and industrial property – Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Community plant variety rights – Obligation to pay reasonable compensation to the holder of such a right and to compensate the holder for any further damage resulting from the act in question – Criteria for determining reasonable compensation – Infringement – Regulation (EC) No 1768/95 – Farmers’ privilege – Costs of monitoring and supervision

Judges:

Jaaskinen AG

Citations:

C-509/10, [2012] EUECJ C-509/10

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Regulation (EC) No 2100/94, Regulation (EC) No 1768/95

Cited by:

Opinion – Geistbeck and Another v Saatgut-Treuhandverwaltungs Gmbh ECJ 5-Jul-2012
ECJ Intellectual and industrial property – Community plant variety rights – Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – ‘Farmer’s privilege’ – Concept of ‘reasonable compensation’ – Compensation for damage suffered – . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

European, Agriculture, Intellectual Property

Updated: 04 November 2022; Ref: scu.463190