A case of champagne was sold and delivered by wine merchants to a licensee. It was a term of the contract that the champagne should be delivered to the licensee’s premises.
Held: The claim was lost. The champagne was signed for at the licensee’s premises by a rogue. Good delivery had been effected when it was made to a person at the buyer’s premises apparently authorised to receive the goods.
Judges:
Lush and Greer LJJ
Citations:
[1924] 2 KB 155
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Contract
Updated: 31 July 2022; Ref: scu.259333
