EAT Discrimination – burden of proof – whether Bahl v Law Society still good law – significance of first tribunal’s findings on unfair dismissal claim when second tribunal conducted discrimination hearing following remission by EAT.
 UKEAT 0180 – 06 – 2807
England and Wales
See Also – J Fernandez v The Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and the Health Service Commissioner EAT 20-Jul-2006
EAT Race Discrimination – Direct . .
Cited – Dr Anya v University of Oxford and Another CA 22-Mar-2001
Discrimination – History of interactions relevant
When a tribunal considered whether the motive for an act was discriminatory, it should look not just at the act, but should make allowance for earlier acts which might throw more light on the act in question. The Tribunal should assess the totality . .
Cited – Madarassy v Nomura International Plc CA 26-Jan-2007
The claimant appealed against adverse findings on her claims of sex discrimination. The court considered questions arising from the provisions relating to the transfer of the burden of proof in a discrimination case.
Held: Questions of the . .
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 31 January 2021; Ref: scu.244142