The court considered when the claimant was said to have become aware of the possibility of a claim: ‘In order to mount the action she did not need to be advised that the failure to advise amounted to professional negligence. This is irrelevant for the purposes of subsection (5) and the start date for reckoning the limitation period.’
Citations:
[2001] Lloyds Rep PN 183
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Denekamp v Denekamp CA 8-Dec-2005
Appeal against striking out of claim and civil restraint order. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Limitation, professional Negligence
Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.237737
