Farstad Supply AS v Enviroco Ltd and Another: SCS 1 May 2009


[2009] ScotCS CSIH – 35




Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1940 3(2)


Appeal fromFarstad Supply As v Enviroco Ltd and Another SCS 23-Apr-2008
(Outer House) The pursuers alleged that the defendant service company was responsible in negligence for damage by fire to its oil rig supply vessel. It was said that oil they had failed to clear was released by piping when opened flowing onto a hot . .

Cited by:

See alsoEnviroco Ltd v Farstad Supply A/S ChD 22-May-2009
. .
See AlsoEnviroco Ltd v Farstad Supply A/S CA 18-Dec-2009
A company which would otherwise undoubtedly be the subsidiary of another company ceased to be so when the shares in the former company were charged by the latter company to a Scottish bank. . .
Appeal fromFarstad Supply As v Enviroco Ltd SC 5-May-2010
The defendants (E) were liable to F after a serious offshore accident, but sought a contribution from a third party (A), the main charterers, seeking to rely on section 3(2) o the 1940 Act saying that ‘if sued they might have been liable’. The court . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Scotland, Negligence

Updated: 24 July 2022; Ref: scu.341811