Individual officers, but not the police force itself are answerable in a race discrimination claim. The force is not vicariously liable for an individual officer’s acts.
Citations:
Gazette 06-Nov-1996, Times 10-Oct-1996, [1996] EWCA Civ 684, [1998] QB 65, (1997) 9 Admin LR 601, [1997] 1 All ER 289
Links:
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – SPV v AM and Another CA 27-Aug-1999
The respondent sought leave to appeal against a decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal that he was an appropriate respondent to the claimant’s claim for sex discrimination. The claimant had been a police officer, and claimed she had been the . .
Cited – Chief Constable of Kent County Constabulary v Baskerville CA 3-Sep-2003
The claimant sought damages for sex discrimination by fellow police officers in an action against the Chief Constable. The Chief Constable said he was liable for the unlawful acts of fellow officers.
Held: Anything done by an employee was done . .
Cited – Barwise, Regina (on the Application Of) v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police Admn 8-Jul-2004
The applicant sought judicial review of the decision of the respondent to remove his status of police constable. He had been absent from work with stress for a long time. He had failed to attend appointments on police premises.
Held: The . .
Cited – Gichura v Home Office and Another CA 20-May-2008
The claimant sought damages after his treatment as a disabled person whilst held in immigration detention centres. The court dismissed his claim on the basis of Amin.
Held: The application of the Amin case was too simplistic. The various . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Discrimination, Torts – Other, Police
Updated: 31 October 2022; Ref: scu.140551
