FA and AA (PBS Effect of Pankina) Nigeria: UTIAC 25 Aug 2010

UTIAC The effect of the decision of the Court of Appeal in Pankina is not limited to the ‘three-month rule’ in relation to evidence of funds. Policy Guidance does not have the status of Immigration Rules for the purposes of immigration appeals.

Citations:

[2010] UKUT 304 (IAC)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedSecretary of State for The Home Department v Pankina CA 23-Jun-2010
Each claimant had graduated from a tertiary college and wished to stay on in the UK. They challenged the points based system for assessing elgibility introduced in 2008 after they had commenced their studies. The new rules tightened the criteria for . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration

Updated: 23 August 2022; Ref: scu.422372