EAT Sex Discrimination – Comparison – Burden of proof
Practice and Procedure – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
Direct sex discrimination – less favourable treatment – comparative exercise – Respondents’ explanation – adequacy of reasons.
Citations:
[2008] UKEAT 0080 – 08 – 2305
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Dr Anya v University of Oxford and Another CA 22-Mar-2001
Discrimination – History of interactions relevant
When a tribunal considered whether the motive for an act was discriminatory, it should look not just at the act, but should make allowance for earlier acts which might throw more light on the act in question. The Tribunal should assess the totality . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – F and C Asset Management Plc and others v Switalski CA 20-Oct-2008
. .
See Also – F and C Asset Management Plc and others v Switalski EAT 9-Dec-2008
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Review
UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissal
SEX DISCRIMINATION: Direct
Two appeals in respect of two matters heard together by the Employment Tribunal:
(i) . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 15 July 2022; Ref: scu.268112
