Extraktionstechnik Gesellschaft fur Anlagenbau GmbH v Oskar: CA 1984

Where there are unexplained features of both the claim and the defence which are disturbing because they bear the appearance of falsity and disreputable business dealings and questionable conduct, the Court should not make tentative assessments of the respective chances of success of the parties or the relative strengths of their good or bad faith, and should not on such an examination grant the defendant conditional leave to defend but should give unconditional leave to defend.

Citations:

(1984) 128 SJ 417, (1984) LS Gaz 1362

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedNolan v Wright ChD 26-Feb-2009
The defendant sought to re-open the question of whether the charge under which he might otherwise be liable was an extortionate credit bargain. The creditor said that that plea was time barred. The defendant argued that a finding that the agreement . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.304586