European Dynamics Sa v HM Treasury: TCC 23 Dec 2009

The claimant challenged a framework agreement proposed by the defendant for the delivery of software application solutions for various national public bodies.
Akenhead J
[2009] EWHC 3419 (TCC), [2010] Eu LR 397, 128 Con LR 36, (2010) 26 Const LJ 191
Public Contracts Regulations 2006
CitedJobsin Co UK Plc (T/A Internet Recruitment Solutions) v Department of Health CA 13-Jul-2001
The Court considered the application of a three month limitation period, imposed by the Regulations. Lord Justice Dyson said: ‘It would be strange if a complaint could not be brought until the process has been completed. It may be too late to . .

Cited by:
CitedMontpellier Estates Ltd v Leeds City Council QBD 24-Jun-2010
The defendant sought to strike out certain parts of the claim against it relating to the tendering process for works on a substantial development. It was said that the defendant had given improper preference for the development of its own site.
CitedNATS (Services) Ltd v Gatwick Airport Ltd and Another TCC 2-Oct-2014
NATS had tendered unsuccessfully for a contract to provide air traffic control services at Gatrwick airport, and challenged the award. GAL denied that the Regulations applied and now sought disapplication of the automatic suspension from the award . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 22 February 2021; Ref: scu.393360