Where a party seeking injunctive relief departed from normal practice, in this case by applying to the Queen’s Bench rather than the Chancery Division for an injunction in an intellectual property case, they must file an explanation of why they had departed from that practice. Where a court did not give its reasons for a decision immediately, it should nevertheless be delivered promptly, and in the case of any delay, the reason for the delay should be explained to the parties.
Judges:
Sir Andrew Morritt VC, Chadwick LJ
Citations:
Times 18-Dec-2001, Gazette 14-Feb-2002, [2001] EWCA Civ 1943, [2002] FSR 48, (2002) 25(3) IPD 25017
Links:
Statutes:
Civil Procedure Rules Part 25 paragraph 8.5
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Litigation Practice, Intellectual Property, Civil Procedure Rules, Employment
Updated: 28 May 2022; Ref: scu.201553
