Edwards v Lloyd’s TSB Bank plc: ChD 2004

A contract in which one co-owner’s signature has been forged by the other is not a nullity but remains valid in relation to the fraudulent co-owner.


[2004] EWHC 1745 (Ch)


England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedBowling and Co Solicitors v Edehomo ChD 2-Mar-2011
The court was asked ‘when an innocent vendor whose signature is forged on the documents for the conveyance of land suffers damage, for the purposes of limitation of an action arising from a solicitor’s breach of duty. Is it on the exchange of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract, Torts – Other

Updated: 04 June 2022; Ref: scu.430276