Eckstein and Another v Reynolds: 30 May 1837

Defendant’s agent told plaintiff that he had called to tender andpound;8 in settlement of defendant’s account ; plaintiff answered that he would take nothing leas than the bill, which defendant’s agent produced at the time, amourttirig to andpound;19. Held, that the question whether this tender was conditional or unconditional, was proper to be Ieft to the jury.
[1837] EngR 770, (1837) 7 Ad and E 80, (1837) 112 ER 401
Commonlii
England and Wales

Updated: 21 May 2021; Ref: scu.313887