EB, Regina v: CACD 16 Oct 2006

Appeal from conviction of rape. The appellant had not disclosed that he was HIV+ (although he did not represent that he did not have HIV).
Held: The appeal succeeded. Consent was not vitiated.
[2006] EWCA Crim 2945, [2007] 1 WLR 1567
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedLawrance, Regina v CACD 23-Jul-2020
Consent not removed by Lie as to Vasectomy
The defendant appealed from his conviction of rape. He had represented to his victim that he had had a vasectomy to secure consent which the court found had been vitiated.
Held: The appeal was allowed. Could a lie about fertility negate . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 12 July 2021; Ref: scu.270255