EAT Practice and Procedure : Amendment – The Employment Judge refused an application for permission to amend the ET1 to claim victimisation. She approached the application on the footing that there was no clear legal basis for the amendment.
Held: there was a clear legal basis for the amendment; for this and other reasons the Employment Judge’s approach to the application was flawed; and if she had approached the application correctly in law she would have granted it. Permission to amend granted (Jafri v Lincoln College [2014] EWCA Civ 449 considered and applied).
David Richardson HHJ
[2014] UKEAT 0534 – 13 – 2205
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Jafri v Lincoln College CA 16-Apr-2014
The claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure had been rejected by the ET and EAT. The court was asked whether the claimant could rely upon a point not previously raised.
Held: The appeal failed. Where a court . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 20 December 2021; Ref: scu.536280
