The claimant sought to have admitted evidence that in the course of without prejudice negotiations, the defendant had threatened to put assets beyond the jurisdiction.
Held: The statement was not an admission as such and was admissible.
Citations:
15 March 1999 (unreported)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Distinguished – Berry Trade Ltd and Another v Moussavi and others CA 22-May-2003
A defendant appealed against an order admitting as evidence, records of ‘without prejudice’ conversations.
Held: Written and oral communications, which are made for the purpose of a genuine attempt to compromise a dispute between the parties, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Evidence
Updated: 12 May 2022; Ref: scu.182477
