Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Struck out of the list in respect of Aziz Marthoca; No violation of Art. 2; Violation of Art. 3; Violation of Art. 5; Not necessary to examine Art. 8; Not necessary to examine P1-1; Violation of P4-2; Not necessary to examine P4-3; No failure to comply with obligations under Art. 34; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses award – Convention proceedings 25316/94; 25317/94; 25318/94; 25319/94; 25320/94; 25321/94; 27207/95
The court acknowledged its weakness as a tribunal of fact: ‘the court is acutely aware of its own shortcomings as a first instance tribunal of fact’.
References: 25316/94 ; 25317/94 ; 253
Statutes: Eropean Convention on Human Rights
This case is cited by:
- Cited – Faulkner, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another SC 1-May-2013
The applicants had each been given a life sentence, but having served the minimum term had been due to have the continued detention reviewed to establish whether or not continued detention was necessary for the protection of the pblic. It had not . .
(,  UKSC 23,  WLR(D) 162, ,  2 WLR 1157, UKSC 2011/0156, , , UKSC 2011/0124,  2 AC 254, 35 BHRC 378,  2 All ER 1013,  HRLR 24, )
These lists may be incomplete.
Last Update: 27 November 2020; Ref: scu.166114