Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

De Bruyn v Parliament (Rec 1983,P 2879) (Judgment): ECJ 29 Sep 1983

Citations:

C-223/82, [1983] EUECJ C-223/82

Links:

European

Updated: 21 May 2022; Ref: scu.133489

Posted on May 22, 2022May 22, 2022 by dlsPosted in European

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Castille v Commission (Rec 1986,P 497) (Judgment): ECJ 6 Feb 1986

Next Next post: Brautigam v Council (Rec 1985,P 2401) (Judgment): ECJ 11 Jul 1985

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

Oldcorn, Regina (on the Application Of) v West London Mental Health NHS Trust: Admn 16 Mar 2005
Harrison v Secretary of State for the Home Department: ChD 22 Apr 2005
Lewis v Eliades , Karis, Kaissides: ChD 22 Apr 2005
Daliah Dorit Sherrington and others v Sherrington: CA 22 Mar 2005
Anthony, Regina v: CACD 11 Apr 2005
Kelly and Another v Regina: CACD 5 May 2005
O Ltd v Z: ChD 23 Feb 2005
R W v Sheffield City Council: Admn 14 Apr 2005
Bunce v Postworth Ltd (T/A Skyblue): CA 4 May 2005
Green, Regina (on the Application Of) v First Secretary of State and others: Admn 13 Apr 2005
Botham v Ministry of Defence: CA 14 Mar 2005
Saggar v Ministry of Defence: CA 27 Apr 2005
Parkin v HM Coroner for North Lincolnshire and Grimsby District: Admn 23 Mar 2005
Concord Trust v Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc: HL 28 Apr 2005
Batsford Estates (1983) Company Ltd v Taylor and Another: CA 29 Apr 2005
Sritharan v Law Society: CA 27 Apr 2005
Quintavalle v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority: HL 28 Apr 2005
South Central Trains Ltd. v Rodway: CA 18 Apr 2005
Lekstaka, Regina (on the Application of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another: Admn 18 Apr 2005
Kai-Whitewind, Regina v: CACD 3 May 2005
CNA Insurance Company Ltd and others: ComC 22 Apr 2005
Matheson, Re an Order and Judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal: ScS 22 Apr 2005
Smith v Charles Building Services Ltd and Another: ChD 22 Apr 2005
Inland Revenue v Ainsworth and others: CA 22 Apr 2005
Alba Management Consultants Ltd v Carillon Plc and Another: ScS 20 Apr 2005
Thackery, Regina v: CACD 11 Apr 2005
Herbert and Another, Regina v: CACD 22 Apr 2005
Cushnie and Another, Regina v: CACD 21 Apr 2005
Gillanders v Arthur Bell (Scotch Tweeds) Ltd and Another: ScS 26 Apr 2005
Lloyds TSB Bank Plc v Hayward: CA 27 Apr 2005
Jones v Isleworth Crown Court: Admn 2 Mar 2005
Williams v Lindley (formerly Williams): CA 10 Feb 2005
London Borough of Lambeth, Regina (on the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Admn 20 Apr 2005
ATOMIC Austria v OHMI (Judgment): ECFI 20 Apr 2005
Verein fur Konsumenteninformation v Commission: ECFI 13 Apr 2005
Birgani v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 13 Apr 2005
Regina v Mushtaq: HL 21 Apr 2005
Ampafrance v OHMI-Johnson and Johnson (Monbebe): ECFI 21 Apr 2005
Beart v HM Prison Service: CA 26 Apr 2005
Ayliffe and others v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 21 Apr 2005
Krippendorf, Regina (on the Application Of) v General Medical Council: Admn 3 Mar 2005
Rusiga v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 14 Mar 2005
Platia v Thermatic Building Services Ltd.: CA 18 Mar 2005
Scammell and others v Dicker: CA 14 Apr 2005
In re M (a Child) (Contact Order): CA 11 Apr 2005
Sundholm v Commission (Staff Regulations): ECFI 20 Apr 2005
Kruger v OHMI- Calpis (Calpico): ECFI 20 Apr 2005
Onyeador v World Ltd and Another: CA 20 Apr 2005
Nielsen v Council (Staff Regulations): ECFI 13 Apr 2005
Faber Chimica v OHMI – Industrias Quimicas Naber (Faber) (Intellectual Property): ECFI 20 Apr 2005

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.