DC v London Borough of Ealing: UTAA 11 Jan 2010

Tribunal procedure and practice (including UT) – statements of reasons

Citations:

[2010] UKUT 10 (AAC)

Links:

Bailii

Citing:

CitedAlloway, Regina (on The Application of) v London Borough of Bromley Admn 17-Sep-2008
The claimant, a young autistic adult, sought judicial review of an assesment carried out for the respondent under the 2000 Act as to his educational needs. . .
CitedWS v Whitefield Schools and Centre and Another Admn 7-May-2008
S challenged the decision of the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal that the school had not failed to ensure the return of his son to school within the academic year.
Held:The weight to be attached to any particular evidence ‘is . .
CitedLawrence, Regina (on the Application of) v London Borough of Southwark and Another Admn 25-May-2005
Stanley Burnton J considered the nature of an assessment of educational needs, saying that a tribunal in this type of case must necessarily look forward, and ‘the fact that the provision is specified on the basis of a promise or assurance as to the . .
CitedVK v Norfolk County Council and Another Admn 17-Dec-2004
When recording the facts, a tribunal should be careful not simply to repeat the evidence heard without making clear which evidence had been accepted and which not. . .
CitedYeboah v Crofton CA 31-May-2002
The industrial tribunal had made a finding of direct race discrimination. The Employment Appeal Tribunal found the decision perverse, and ordered a rehearing. The applicant appealed that order.
Held: The EAT must be careful not to take . .
CitedS v South Gloucestershire County Council and Confrey Admn 19-Jun-1998
Gilliatt Leave to appeal out of time against SENT’s decision. The Tribunal itself had formed the view shortly after hearing a case that their decision might be flawed, due to a decision of the Court of Appeal . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Education

Updated: 17 August 2022; Ref: scu.410585