Davie v New Merton Board Mills: CA 1958

Parker LJ pointed out that the reasoning in Biddle was inconsistent with other decisions to the effect that there is no duty of care in respect of premises over which the master has no control, but it is consistent with alternative ratios that the duty had been discharged.

Judges:

Parker LJ

Citations:

[1958] 1 All ER 67

Citing:

CitedBiddle v Hart 1907
A stevedore’s workman, whilst unloading a ship, was injured owing to a defect in the tackle, and he was suing his master. The learned Judge withdrew the case from the jury, on the ground that the stevedore was not responsible for a defect in the . .

Cited by:

Appeal fromDavie v New Merton Board Mills Ltd HL 1959
The employer provided an employee with a simple metal tool, a drift, with no apparent defect, which had, in fact, been manufactured to excessive hardness, as the result of negligent heat treatment by the otherwise reputable manufacturer. That was a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Negligence

Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.445622