Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig: ECJ 11 Nov 2014

ECJ Judgment – Free movement of persons – Citizenship of the Union – Equal treatment – Economically inactive nationals of a Member State residing in the territory of another Member State – Exclusion of those persons from special non-contributory cash benefits under Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Directive 2004/38/EC – Right of residence for more than three months – Articles 7(1)(b) and 24 – Condition requiring sufficient resources)

V Skouris, President, K. Lenaerts, Vice-President, A. Tizzano, L Bay Larsen, T von Danwitz, C Vajda, S Rodin, Presidents of Chambers, E Juhasz, A Borg Barthet, J Malenovsky, E Levits, M Berger (Rapporteur) and JL da Cruz Vilaca, Judges
[2014] EUECJ C-333/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2358, [2015] 1 CMLR 48, [2015] CEC 1045, [2015] 1 WLR 2519, [2014] WLR(D) 477, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2358, [2015] All ER (EC) 1
Bailii, WLRD
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, Directive 2004/38/EC 7(1)(b) 24
Cited by:
CitedMirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Samin v Westminster City Council SC 27-Jan-2016
The claimants, a Polish national and an Austrian national, appealed against decisions of the Court of Appeal upholding decisions that they were not entitled to certain benefits, namely income support and housing assistance respectively, pursuant to . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration, Benefits

Leading Case

Updated: 31 October 2021; Ref: scu.538689