DA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Admn 22 Jun 2017

The claim relates to the revised Benefit Cap which (among other exemptions) requires the parent in order to avoid the imposition of the cap to work at least 16 hours per week. The Benefit Cap was originally imposed by Sections 96 and 97 of the Welfare Reform Act 2012. These have been amended by the Welfare Reform and Work Act 2016. The material effect of the amendment was to reduce the annual limit for the receipt of welfare benefits from pounds 26,000 per annum to pounds 20,000 for those living outside of and pounds 23,000 for those living within Greater London. The reductions were brought into effect by Regulations on 7 November 2016. The cap affects all benefit claimants, but there are different rates for couples, whether or not they have children, and lone parents with children.

Judges:

Collins J

Citations:

[2017] EWHC 1446 (Admin), [2017] WLR(D) 409, [2017] PTSR 1266

Links:

Bailii, WLRD

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

At First InstanceDA and Others, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions SC 15-May-2019
Several lone parents challenged the benefits cap, saying that it was discriminatory.
Held: (Hale, Kerr LL dissenting) The parents’ appeals failed. The legislation had a clear impact on lone parents and their children. The intention was to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Benefits

Updated: 07 February 2022; Ref: scu.588874