Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga: SC 9 Mar 2022

The tenant had a five year flexible tenancy. The landlord sought to terminate the tenancy for antisocial behaviour. She responded that the agreement included no express provision for re-entry or forfeiture. The Council landlord now appealed a finding that it did not have the right of re-entry.
Held: The Council’s appeal succeeded in part.

Citations:

[2022] UKSC 7

Links:

Bailii, Bailii Press Summary, Bailii Issues and Facts

Statutes:

Law of Property Act 1925, Housing Act 1985 79

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromCroydon London Borough Council v Kalonga CA 27-Jan-2021
Whether a landlord can terminate a flexible tenancy agreement for a fixed term of five years prior to the expiry of the fixed term if no express provision is made in the tenancy agreement for re-entry or forfeiture . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Housing

Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.674561