Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Crosier v Crosier: FD 9 Dec 1993

Clean break principle does not relate to maintenance of children.

Citations:

Times 09-Dec-1993

Statutes:

Child Support Act 1991

Child Support

Updated: 19 May 2022; Ref: scu.79679

Posted on May 19, 2022May 19, 2022 by dlsPosted in Child SupportTagged Child Support

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Criminal Proceedings Against E Clarke Ltd and Sons (Coaches) Ltd and Another: ECJ 1 May 1998
Next Next post: D v Director of Public Prosecutions and Others: QBD 4 Apr 1995

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,122)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (620)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (359)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,503)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (214)
  • Commercial (1,422)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,024)
  • Constitutional (949)
  • Construction (1,169)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (730)
  • Contract (6,112)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,548)
  • Crime (8,397)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,313)
  • Criminal Sentencing (2,484)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,627)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,719)
  • Environment (820)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,885)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,589)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,012)
  • Health (1,522)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,927)
  • Housing (1,991)
  • Human Rights (19,608)
  • Immigration (56,350)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,618)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,043)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,534)
  • International (956)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,047)
  • Jury (861)
  • Land (5,293)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,648)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,956)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,062)
  • Litigation Practice (7,050)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,754)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,901)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (823)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,740)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,756)
  • Transport (2,042)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,781)

Recent Posts

  • Secretary of State for Defence, Regina (on the Application Of) v Pensions Appeal Tribunal and Another: Admn 22 Oct 2004
  • In re R (Children): CA 7 Oct 2002
  • Mwaura and others v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 15 Oct 2002
  • Mcgowan v Davis and Another: CA 26 Mar 2001
  • Masters v Sussex Chief Constable: CA 3 Oct 2002
  • Arnott v Melton Borough Council: CA 22 Nov 2002
  • Hood v Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust: CA 21 Mar 2001
  • Jest v Thistle Hotels Plc: CA 20 Mar 2001
  • Pagemanor Ltd v Ryan and others: CA 2 Oct 2002
  • Lee v Doncaster and South Humber Healthcare NHS Trust and Another: CA 2 Oct 2002
  • Nyapokoto, Regina (on the Application of) v An Adjudicator: CA 17 Oct 2002
  • Tassell and Another v National Westminster Bank Plc: CA 26 Feb 2001
  • Morley v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust and Another: CA 28 Oct 2002
  • Marya v Southall Properties Ltd (Re-instatement application): CA 27 Mar 2001
  • Marya v Southall Properties Ltd: CA 27 Mar 2001
  • Saxena v Rushforth and Another: CA 11 Oct 2002
  • Claydon v Boys and Maughan and Another: CA 18 Nov 2002
  • Nelson v Carillion Services Ltd: CA 15 Oct 2002
  • Regina v Murphy: CACD 31 May 2002
  • Raffile v Government of the United States of America: Admn 2 Dec 2004
  • Tower Hamlets v Buller and others: EAT 16 May 2001
  • Pat (Pensions) Ltd v Kamal and Another: CA 5 Jul 2002
  • Key Communications Ltd v Rose and others: EAT 5 Jul 2002
  • Din v Ahmed and others: CA 30 Jul 2002
  • Krasniqi v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 18 Jul 2002
  • Bertram Breach v Lloyds TSB Insurance: CA 7 Oct 2002
  • Anfield v Anfield: CA 20 Nov 2001
  • Holmes v Wheeler-Johns: CA 28 Oct 2002
  • ALM Medical Services Ltd v Bladon: CA 22 Nov 2001
  • Walji v Great Ormond Street Hospital: CA 10 Aug 2001
  • Rickards and Another v Jones and others: CA 29 Jul 2002
  • Rapose v London Borough of Wandsworth: CA 16 Jul 2002
  • Najjemba, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 15 Jul 2002
  • A v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 18 Jul 2002
  • Hinchcliffe v HSBC Plc and Another: CA 5 Jul 2002
  • Swansea City and County Director of Housing/Finance v Oben: CA 3 Jul 2002
  • Sealand Housing Corporation v Siemens Ag: CA 2 Jul 2002
  • In re G (A Child): CA 20 Jun 2002
  • Gibson and Another v Davies and Another: CA 16 Jul 2002
  • Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc v Talbot: EAT 21 Feb 1997
  • Great Future International Limited and Others v Sealand Housing Corporation and Others: ChD 19 Jan 2004
  • Russell v Wincanton Ltd: CA 13 Mar 2003
  • Adjei v King: CA 19 Mar 2003
  • In re May Yoong Forwell, Drug Trafficking Offences Act 1986: CA 12 Nov 2003
  • In re Trident Fashions plc: ChD 5 Feb 2004
  • Worcestershire County Council v Tongue and others: ChD 6 Aug 2003
  • In re D (J): ChD 1982
  • Hulbert and Others v Avens and Another: ChD 30 Jan 2003
  • Pople v Evans: ChD 1969
  • Sledmore v Dalby: CA 8 Feb 1996

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.