The claimant challenged the grant of planning permission for a moveable brow platform to be placed to provide access to houseboats at moorings near his property. He said that the permission had been granted in error as to the interpretation of an exclusion zone created in a previous permission.
Held: The earlier permission had been granted on the basis that any reduction in the space allowed would be unacceptable. The drawings here did show a reduction at parts from 21m to 17m. That was not academic, and some amendment of the plans was required. The court asked the parties to return with proposals.
Judges:
Chrystoper Symons QC
Citations:
[2013] EWHC 853 (Admin)
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Godfrey, Regina (on The Application of) v Southwark CA 24-Apr-2012
The claimant appealed against rejection of permission to commence judicial review of the decision of the defendant to grant planning permission for a new health centre.
Held: A local authority is bound to act in the public interest and it is . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Planning
Updated: 17 November 2022; Ref: scu.472682
