The claimant sought an injunction to prevent further publication by the second defendants of confidential papers taken from them by the first defendant on her dismissal.
Held: An interlocutory injunction was granted prohibiting the defendants until trial from publishing, disclosing or using information defined as confidential information in a confidential schedule.
Judges:
Lloyd J
Citations:
Unreported, 5 July 2002
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Cream Holdings Limited and others v Banerjee and The Liverpool Daily Post and Echo Limited CA 13-Feb-2003
The defendants considered publication of alleged financial irregularities by the claimant, who sought to restrain publication. The defendants argued that under the Act, prior restraint should not be used unless a later court would be likely to . .
At first Instance – Cream Holdings Limited and others v Banerjee and others HL 14-Oct-2004
On her dismissal from the claimant company, Ms Banerjee took confidential papers revealing misconduct to the local newspaper, which published some. The claimant sought an injunction to prevent any further publication. The defendants argued that the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Media, Information
Updated: 30 April 2022; Ref: scu.216439
